What is the relationship between “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” and “Thirty -Six”? The truth is the case

Isn’t Gongzi Military Law “Thirty -Six? Many people think so.

Let’s listen to a little story.

A military professor had a course, which explained to entrepreneurs to explain the “Sun Tzu’s Art of War”.

The professor was very interesting, and the sidelines were cited, and it was endless. After talking for a long time, a entrepreneur couldn’t sit still and asked, “Why don’t you enter the topic?”

The professor stunned: “What is the topic?”

That person said very much: “Thirty -six plans! Isn’t there thirty -six plans in” Sun Tzu’s Art of War “?”

The professor couldn’t cry and laughed, and said, “These two books, one two thousand years ago, one two thousand years later, it doesn’t matter! Besides, I handle the sheep, touch the fish in muddy water, rob the robbery while the fire, and hide the swords. Do you use me to teach? It is a big strategy and a big pattern! “

In fact, not only this entrepreneur, most of us will subconsciously associate “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” and “Thirty -Six” when they do not study. Even some books directly use the “Sun Tzu’s Thirty -Six” as the title of the book, and the author must be marked: the author is (Spring and Autumn) Sun Wu. It’s no wonder that it will be misunderstood.

Today, we have to read the “Sun Tzu’s Art of War”. First of all, we must know- “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” and “Thirty -Six”, not the same book.


What does “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” say

“Sun Tzu’s Art of War”, also known as the “Sun Wu Military”, is the earliest military writings in the world and the earliest in China.

Its author is the grandson, which is written in the late Spring and Autumn Period.


Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods are a very magical era. The basic spiritual pulse, value orientation, thinking logic, and philosophical concept of Chinese culture have been established in this era.

During that period, the stars were bright and a hundred schools of contention, and great thinkers successively emerged: Lao Tzu, Confucius, Zhuangzi, Mencius, Xunzi, Mozi, Han Feizi … of course, including Sun Tzu.

Sun Tzu, formerly known as Sun Wu, was born in a military family from Qi State. Later, because of the domestic chaos, he went to Wu State.

Wu Wang saw the book Daqi and quickly met his grandson,

“Knowing the grandson can use soldie

Essence The grandson became General Wu Guo, and helped the hegemony.


Sima Qian said in “Historical Records” that Wu Guo “broke the strong Chu” and defeated the strong Chu Kingdom to the west; “People”, I dropped the country to the south; grandson

“And powerful”

Sun Tzu made a lot of contributions in it.

The history books did not record much to the grandson himself, but “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” has been circulating, and deeply rooted in the context of Chinese culture.

A professor of Peking University said:

“Today, to study Confucianism, you have to read the Analects;

To study Taoist thoughts, you have to read the Tao Te Ching;

To study Chinese philosophy, you have to read the Book of Changes;

To study the strategic thoughts of Chinese people, you have to read “Sun Tzu’s Art of War”. “

It can be seen that the status of “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” in strategic studies can really be said to be the “sanctuary of soldiers”.

“Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is not an ordinary war book. It is not specifically told you a certain war, nor is it to teach you the formation of the formation of troops.

The ancients commented on its “word beads”, and today people commented that it was “simple and profound, simple and profound.”

It is a highly abstract military philosophy, which transcends specific methodology. From the perspective of simplicity dialectics, it summarizes the basic laws of war and war guidance.

So, what’s the matter of “Thirty -Sixth Plan”?


What does “Thirty -Six Messing” say

“Thirty -Six” is a book that was written in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and the author was unable to test.

As early as the Northern and Southern Dynasties, there was a saying of “thirty -six strategies”. There are records in “Nanqi Book”: “Tan Gong’s thirty -six strategies, walking as the upper plan, Ru’s father and son should only go to the ears.” It means that the defeat has been determined and irreparable.

The “thirty -six strategy” statement is used by future generations. In the Song Dynasty Hui Hong’s “Leng Zhai Night Talk” also mentioned: “Thirty -six plans, walking as the upper plan.”

By the end of the Ming and early Qing dynasties, more people quoted the word.


Someone collected group books and compiled into “Thirty -Six”.

But who is the specific editor and in which year in the book, can no longer investigate.

This book is also not long, with about 5,000 words. A total of six sets, which are:

Victory of war, enemy war, attack battle, melee, tuning scores, defeats.

Each set contains six places, with a total of thirty -six plans.

The first three sets are used by the advantages, and the latter three sets are used in disadvantages.

There are only a few sentences in each plan, and then quote some of the war cases before the Song Dynasty, some statements of Sun Wu, Wu Qi, and Wei Liaozi, that is, the end. For example, the original text is as follows:

“Fifth Messing · Robbery while Fire”

[Original Code] The enemy is harmful, and the momentum is profitable, and the rigidity is soft.

[According to words] Inside the enemy, the land is robbed; the enemy is abroad, but the people are robbed of the people; Such as: Yue Wang took Wu’s domestic crab rice and attacked it. He died and took Wu Beihui the princes in Huangchi.


It can be said that “Thirty -Six Plan” is a work of a military strategy.

So, where is the difference between “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” and “Thirty -Six”?


“Tao” and “Art”

If the core thoughts of the two books are refined into three keywords, it may be like this:

“Thirty -Six”: War is the victory, the strategy of the mind, and the means of no choice;

“Sun Tzu’s Art of War”: victory, strategic thinking, life wisdom.

This is the fundamental difference between the pattern and the realm. In simple terms, the clue can be seen from the directory:

The directory of “Thirty -Six” is: sounding east, Chencang, watching fire from the other side, hiding swords in the smile, Li Daitao stiff, hand -handed sheep …


The catalog of “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is: planning, combat, conspiracy, formation, shape, virtual reality, military struggle, nine changes, marching, terrain, nine land, fire attack, room.

Fine appreciation, look down.

The era of “Thirty -Six” is Ming and Qing. The overall social weather has been exposed and declining, which is completely different from the vibrant and creative atmosphere in the spring and autumn. At this time, the soldiers generated at this time, with the soldiers in the Spring and Autumn Period, have obvious gaps in levels and realms.

In the final analysis,

“Thirty -Six” is about strategy, a small “technique” in the military law; and “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is a strategy and a big “Tao” of the military.

General Wu Rusong, who is 80 years old, once commented on these two books:

“The different key issues of the two are in terms of purpose.

“Thirty -Six” believes that as long as the purpose can be achieved, all means to harm others can be used

, Borrowing a knife, robbery while fire, hiding knives, beauty planning, etc.

And “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is


High -level strategic work

, National Hero Qi Jiguang said that “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is the ‘superior teaching’. How can “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” with the Thirty -Six? “

In fact, the “means” itself is not good and evil. However, if you only teach people to blade and do not help people, the means can be easily abused, misunderstood, or even crowded, which will cause greater consequences.

Mr. Yang Ming captured King Ning in 38 days that year, and also used the means of saving Wei Zhao, anti -troops, slowing soldiers, fire attacks and other methods. The point is that Mr. Yang Ming’s heart is positive. He insight into people’s hearts to better suppress the ego and inspire me.

Every ego is your own trap.

If you use it when you use it, it is not because of the compassion of the big self, but the calculation of the ego, then, this is the mistake of the military law, and the same reaction will eventually feedback on yourself.

“Sun Tzu’s Art of War” is for the gentleman, not for the villain!

Mr. Yang Ming was rebelled and bandits, and he was invincible, but lamented: “Unfortunately, the spirit of life, all of them have used such nothing.” His heart has always been educating the people instead of the victory and defeat of the war, so Can “be invincible”.

There is such a heart that can give birth to all the way, and the response is endless.

So, where is the difference between “Sun Tzu’s Art of War” and “Thirty -Six”?